Justiwach head in the scandal: accusation of violence and false statements!

Justiwach head in the scandal: accusation of violence and false statements!

In Wiener Neustadt, a 42-year-old judicial officer is on trial who is accused of brutally treating an occupant during a cell control. According to Kurier there was an incident in which the officers came to the ground so violently that he was passed on for a few minutes.

After the incident, the official is said to have dragged the occupants into his cell on the hair, which leads to further allegations. A central point in the procedure is that the official is said to have written a wrong report on what is happening. The public prosecutor accuses him of tempted a colleague about the false statement, explains the Juracademy .

The allegations in detail

The indictment is not only based on the physical attacks, but also on a WhatsApp message from the official. In this message, he asked his colleagues to support his version of the incident in order to avoid possible problems. However, the official denies that this should be interpreted as a request for the wrong statement. Later he was transferred to another department, which for him is a serious consequence after the incident.

The official's colleagues had already submitted their reports and denied their reports to incorporate the accused's statement because they considered his behavior as inappropriate. A colleague who testified as a witness was outraged about the accused's actions. In his defense, the civil servant admits that he had jostled the inmates, but accuses him of having broadcast a threat that prompted him to reaction.

legal framework conditions

The legal aspects of this situation are complex. In the case of statement psychological aspects that often play a role in such cases, the credibility of the statements must be in the room. As anwalt.de often there is a risk that a conviction solely on the basis of the statements of those involved takes place. This phenomenon can be observed in many criminal proceedings and is called "statement against statement".

In this case, the allegations against the officials are serious, but the question arises as to how the legal framework and the evidence are assessed in the court process. The implementation of investigations into truth findings requires a substantial examination of the credibility of everyone involved.

The results of the examination regarding the occupant, which was convicted of a violent crime, did not result in any injuries, while the public prosecutor speaks of bruises and a strain on the wrist. It remains to be seen whether the official is ultimately convicted. The judgment about a conditional prison sentence of 15 months is not yet final.